Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 15:02

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Aurora borealis lights up northern Nevada, Carson City skies - Carson Now
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is your most erotic sex story?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why would a spouse cheat if the marriage is good?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Jerome Powell’s Exit Leaves The Fed On An Uncertain Path - Seeking Alpha
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
'Cheers' star's cause of death released - KING5.com
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.